Early loading of sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split‐mouth comparative study
Identifieur interne : 008A21 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 008A20; suivant : 008A22Early loading of sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split‐mouth comparative study
Auteurs : Mario Roccuzzo [Italie] ; Marco Bunino [Italie] ; Fabrizio Prioglio [Italie] ; Silvio D. Bianchi [Italie]Source :
- Clinical Oral Implants Research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2001-12.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Titane.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Better bone anchorage, Biomedical materials research, Bone integration, Bone loss, Buser, Canine mandible, Clin, Clinical experience, Clinical outcome, Clinical trials, Cochran, Contralateral side, Control implants, Control sites, Crestal bone height, Dental implants, Detrimental effect, Different implants, Early loading, Edentulous areas, Healing period, Histometric study, Immediate loading, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant shoulder, Implants maxilla mandible, Implants research, Implants table, International journal, Jahr nach, Limited implant, Mandible, Master model, Maxilla, Maxillofacial implants, Miniature pigs, Minor pain, Multicenter study, Oral impl, Periapical radiographs, Plants research, Posterior mandible, Postoperative discomfort, Preliminary results, Primary stability, Prosthetic, Prosthetic function, Prosthetic loading, Prosthetic reconstruction, Provisional restoration, Radiographic, Radiographic parameters, Radiographic results, Roccuzzo, Same operator, Same type, Sandblasted, Sites tests, Solid abutments, Surface characteristics, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Surgical treatment, Test sites, Titanium, Titanium implants, Wochen nach, Wurden, Year post surgery.
- Teeft :
- Abutment, Abutment connection, Better bone anchorage, Biomedical materials research, Bone integration, Bone loss, Buser, Canine mandible, Clin, Clinical experience, Clinical outcome, Clinical trials, Cochran, Contralateral side, Control implants, Control sites, Crestal bone height, Dental implants, Detrimental effect, Different implants, Early loading, Edentulous areas, Healing period, Histometric study, Immediate loading, Impl, Implant, Implant dentistry, Implant shoulder, Implants maxilla mandible, Implants research, Implants table, International journal, Jahr nach, Limited implant, Mandible, Master model, Maxilla, Maxillofacial implants, Miniature pigs, Minor pain, Multicenter study, Oral impl, Periapical radiographs, Plants research, Posterior mandible, Postoperative discomfort, Preliminary results, Primary stability, Prosthetic, Prosthetic function, Prosthetic loading, Prosthetic reconstruction, Provisional restoration, Radiographic, Radiographic parameters, Radiographic results, Roccuzzo, Same operator, Same type, Sandblasted, Sites tests, Solid abutments, Surface characteristics, Surgical, Surgical procedure, Surgical treatment, Test sites, Titanium, Titanium implants, Wochen nach, Wurden, Year post surgery.
Abstract
Abstract: Sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implants were recently introduced to reduce the healing period between surgery and prosthesis. In this split‐mouth study, SLA implants were compared to titanium plasma‐sprayed (TPS) implants under loaded conditions one year after placement in 32 healthy patients, with comparable bilateral edentulous sites and no discrepancies in the opposing dentition. The surgical procedure was performed by the same operator and was identical at 68 SLA (test) and 68 TPS (control) sites. Tapping was never performed and primary stability was always achieved. Abutment connection was carried out at 35 Ncm 6 weeks postsurgery for test sites and 12 weeks for the controls, by the same dentist blind to the type of surface of the implant. In 4 of the 68 test sites the implant rotated slightly, patients reported minor pain and connection was not completed. Provisional restoration was fabricated and a new tightening was performed after six weeks. Similar gold‐ceramic restorations were cemented on the same type of solid abutments on both sites. No implant was lost. Clinical measures and radiographic changes were recorded by the same operator, blind to the type of surface of the implant, 1 year post surgery. No significant differences were found with respect to presence of plaque (24% vs. 27%), bleeding on probing (24% vs. 31%), mean pocket depth (3.3 mm vs. 2.9 mm) or mean marginal bone loss (0.65 mm vs. 0.77 mm). The results suggest that SLA implants are suitable for early loading at 6 weeks. Limited implant spinning may occasionally be found but, if properly handled, it produces no detrimental effect on the clinical outcome.
Url:
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120604.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002424
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002424
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 003C39
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 008D53
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 008A21
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Early loading of sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split‐mouth comparative study</title><author><name sortKey="Roccuzzo, Mario" sort="Roccuzzo, Mario" uniqKey="Roccuzzo M" first="Mario" last="Roccuzzo">Mario Roccuzzo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bunino, Marco" sort="Bunino, Marco" uniqKey="Bunino M" first="Marco" last="Bunino">Marco Bunino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Prioglio, Fabrizio" sort="Prioglio, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Prioglio F" first="Fabrizio" last="Prioglio">Fabrizio Prioglio</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bianchi, Silvio D" sort="Bianchi, Silvio D" uniqKey="Bianchi S" first="Silvio D." last="Bianchi">Silvio D. Bianchi</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:49B6D3ECD220A731CFCAB82CCEAAFD2AE29A1CAE</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120604.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/49B6D3ECD220A731CFCAB82CCEAAFD2AE29A1CAE/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002424</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002424</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002424</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003C39</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003C39</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0905-7161:2001:Roccuzzo M:early:loading:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008D53</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">008A21</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">008A21</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Early loading of sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split‐mouth comparative study</title><author><name sortKey="Roccuzzo, Mario" sort="Roccuzzo, Mario" uniqKey="Roccuzzo M" first="Mario" last="Roccuzzo">Mario Roccuzzo</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dental Medicine, University of Torino, Torino</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Turin</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Piémont</region></placeName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Italie</country></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bunino, Marco" sort="Bunino, Marco" uniqKey="Bunino M" first="Marco" last="Bunino">Marco Bunino</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dental Medicine, University of Torino, Torino</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Turin</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Piémont</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Prioglio, Fabrizio" sort="Prioglio, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Prioglio F" first="Fabrizio" last="Prioglio">Fabrizio Prioglio</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dental Medicine, University of Torino, Torino</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Turin</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Piémont</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bianchi, Silvio D" sort="Bianchi, Silvio D" uniqKey="Bianchi S" first="Silvio D." last="Bianchi">Silvio D. Bianchi</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Italie</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dental Medicine, University of Torino, Torino</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Turin</settlement><region type="région" nuts="2">Piémont</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Clinical Oral Implants Research</title><title level="j" type="alt">CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">12</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="572">572</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="578">578</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope><publisher>Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><pubPlace>Copenhagen</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-12">2001-12</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Better bone anchorage</term><term>Biomedical materials research</term><term>Bone integration</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Buser</term><term>Canine mandible</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical experience</term><term>Clinical outcome</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Cochran</term><term>Contralateral side</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Control sites</term><term>Crestal bone height</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Detrimental effect</term><term>Different implants</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous areas</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Histometric study</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implants maxilla mandible</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Implants table</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jahr nach</term><term>Limited implant</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Master model</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Miniature pigs</term><term>Minor pain</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Periapical radiographs</term><term>Plants research</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Postoperative discomfort</term><term>Preliminary results</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic function</term><term>Prosthetic loading</term><term>Prosthetic reconstruction</term><term>Provisional restoration</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic parameters</term><term>Radiographic results</term><term>Roccuzzo</term><term>Same operator</term><term>Same type</term><term>Sandblasted</term><term>Sites tests</term><term>Solid abutments</term><term>Surface characteristics</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Surgical treatment</term><term>Test sites</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Wochen nach</term><term>Wurden</term><term>Year post surgery</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term><term>Abutment connection</term><term>Better bone anchorage</term><term>Biomedical materials research</term><term>Bone integration</term><term>Bone loss</term><term>Buser</term><term>Canine mandible</term><term>Clin</term><term>Clinical experience</term><term>Clinical outcome</term><term>Clinical trials</term><term>Cochran</term><term>Contralateral side</term><term>Control implants</term><term>Control sites</term><term>Crestal bone height</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Detrimental effect</term><term>Different implants</term><term>Early loading</term><term>Edentulous areas</term><term>Healing period</term><term>Histometric study</term><term>Immediate loading</term><term>Impl</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant dentistry</term><term>Implant shoulder</term><term>Implants maxilla mandible</term><term>Implants research</term><term>Implants table</term><term>International journal</term><term>Jahr nach</term><term>Limited implant</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Master model</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillofacial implants</term><term>Miniature pigs</term><term>Minor pain</term><term>Multicenter study</term><term>Oral impl</term><term>Periapical radiographs</term><term>Plants research</term><term>Posterior mandible</term><term>Postoperative discomfort</term><term>Preliminary results</term><term>Primary stability</term><term>Prosthetic</term><term>Prosthetic function</term><term>Prosthetic loading</term><term>Prosthetic reconstruction</term><term>Provisional restoration</term><term>Radiographic</term><term>Radiographic parameters</term><term>Radiographic results</term><term>Roccuzzo</term><term>Same operator</term><term>Same type</term><term>Sandblasted</term><term>Sites tests</term><term>Solid abutments</term><term>Surface characteristics</term><term>Surgical</term><term>Surgical procedure</term><term>Surgical treatment</term><term>Test sites</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Titanium implants</term><term>Wochen nach</term><term>Wurden</term><term>Year post surgery</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Titane</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Abstract: Sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implants were recently introduced to reduce the healing period between surgery and prosthesis. In this split‐mouth study, SLA implants were compared to titanium plasma‐sprayed (TPS) implants under loaded conditions one year after placement in 32 healthy patients, with comparable bilateral edentulous sites and no discrepancies in the opposing dentition. The surgical procedure was performed by the same operator and was identical at 68 SLA (test) and 68 TPS (control) sites. Tapping was never performed and primary stability was always achieved. Abutment connection was carried out at 35 Ncm 6 weeks postsurgery for test sites and 12 weeks for the controls, by the same dentist blind to the type of surface of the implant. In 4 of the 68 test sites the implant rotated slightly, patients reported minor pain and connection was not completed. Provisional restoration was fabricated and a new tightening was performed after six weeks. Similar gold‐ceramic restorations were cemented on the same type of solid abutments on both sites. No implant was lost. Clinical measures and radiographic changes were recorded by the same operator, blind to the type of surface of the implant, 1 year post surgery. No significant differences were found with respect to presence of plaque (24% vs. 27%), bleeding on probing (24% vs. 31%), mean pocket depth (3.3 mm vs. 2.9 mm) or mean marginal bone loss (0.65 mm vs. 0.77 mm). The results suggest that SLA implants are suitable for early loading at 6 weeks. Limited implant spinning may occasionally be found but, if properly handled, it produces no detrimental effect on the clinical outcome.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Italie</li></country><region><li>Piémont</li></region><settlement><li>Turin</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="Italie"><region name="Piémont"><name sortKey="Roccuzzo, Mario" sort="Roccuzzo, Mario" uniqKey="Roccuzzo M" first="Mario" last="Roccuzzo">Mario Roccuzzo</name></region><name sortKey="Bianchi, Silvio D" sort="Bianchi, Silvio D" uniqKey="Bianchi S" first="Silvio D." last="Bianchi">Silvio D. Bianchi</name><name sortKey="Bunino, Marco" sort="Bunino, Marco" uniqKey="Bunino M" first="Marco" last="Bunino">Marco Bunino</name><name sortKey="Prioglio, Fabrizio" sort="Prioglio, Fabrizio" uniqKey="Prioglio F" first="Fabrizio" last="Prioglio">Fabrizio Prioglio</name><name sortKey="Roccuzzo, Mario" sort="Roccuzzo, Mario" uniqKey="Roccuzzo M" first="Mario" last="Roccuzzo">Mario Roccuzzo</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008A21 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 008A21 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:49B6D3ECD220A731CFCAB82CCEAAFD2AE29A1CAE
|texte= Early loading of sandblasted and acid‐etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split‐mouth comparative study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |